Mediumship as Ordinary Experience: An anthropological discussion of ordinary vs non-ordinary – What is the difference?

Schmidt, Bettina E. (2021) Mediumship as Ordinary Experience: An anthropological discussion of ordinary vs non-ordinary – What is the difference? Journal for the Study of Religious Experience, 7 (3). pp. 137-154. ISSN 2057-2301

[img]
Preview
Text
114-Article Text-451-1-10-20210803.pdf

Download (121kB) | Preview
Official URL: https://rerc-journal.tsd.ac.uk/index.php/religious...

Abstract

Using the study of mediumship (spirit possession) as a case study the chapter discusses the methodological differences between labelling an experience as ordinary or non-ordinary. In addition to challenging academic labelling the chapter puts forward the argument to opening the study of religious and spiritual experience in light of Peggy Morgan’s work. The first section looks back at the beginning of the academic study of experience and highlights the contribution of the early Oxford anthropologist R.R. Marrett. Comparing his work with Rudolf Otto’s theological approach it argues against limiting the study to ‘religious experience’. The second section presents the case of seeing mediumship as ordinary experience. Referring to Irving Hallowell’s concept of ‘other than human persons’ and Tim Ingold’s critique of agency it argues that an approach to experience as ordinary can further our understanding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: mediumship; non-ordinary experience; ordinary experience; anthropology of religion; agency
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion
Divisions: Institutes and Academies > Institute of Education and Humanities > Academic Discipline: Humanities
Depositing User: Bettina Schmidt
Date Deposited: 31 Aug 2021 13:24
Last Modified: 31 Aug 2021 13:24
URI: https://repository.uwtsd.ac.uk/id/eprint/1761

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item